Factors predicting the need for surgical intervention for hydronephrosis during pregnancy: a systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Symptomatic hydronephrosis in pregnancy can cause both maternal and obstetric complications. In various studies, factors predicting the need for surgical intervention have been evaluated, however these factors have not been systematically assessed yet. This systematic review analyzes published studies about hydronephrosis during pregnancy and determines the predictive factors for the need for surgical intervention for hydronephrosis during pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in January 2023 using the Medline, Web of Science and ScienceDirect/Scopus databases according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched these databases with the following search strategy: (intervention OR nephrostomy OR stent insertion) AND (pregnancy hydronephrosis). RESULTS: The literature review revealed 2461 potentially eligible studies. After the screening, six studies were enrolled in this review. High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, high C-reactive protein level, high white blood cell count, high creatinine levels, fever, persistent pain for more than 4 days, presence of ureteral stones more than 8 mm, high grade hydronephrosis, high fetal body weight and high delta resistive index were reported to be related with the need for surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: The rate of symptomatic hydronephrosis and requirement for surgical intervention is low during pregnancy. However, as symptomatic hydronephrosis may cause serious obstetric complications, it is important to know the parameters that can predict patients who may need surgical intervention. These results will assist gynecologists and urologists to stratify pregnant women for surgical intervention.

Pregnancy complicated by massive incisional hernia: challenges in management and review of literature.

Pregnancy complicated by incisional hernia is rare but can become an obstetric challenge if the gravid uterus becomes displaced or incarcerated into the hernial sac or if there is ulceration of the overlying dermis as a result of increased intra-abdominal pressure being transmitted to the skin. We report a case of a pregnant woman presenting with a large incisional hernia at 19 weeks of gestation and discuss how problems encountered with progressing pregnancy were managed conservatively by adopting a multidisciplinary team approach (which included surgeons and radiologists). She underwent a caesarean section at 35 weeks of gestation due to active bleeding from the ulcerated skin and foetal growth restriction with subsequent staged secondary hernia repair at a tertiary centre. Close surveillance is mandatory, and a decision on the mode and timing of delivery as well as when to perform the surgical repair of the fascial defect should be team based.

Non-obstetric Acute Abdomen in Pregnancy: a Review of Literature.

Background: Acute abdomen in pregnancy (AAP) is defined as intensive abdominal pain lasting less than 24 hours that may require urgent surgery. It is a challenging situation to diagnose and manage, as it is associated with pain due to the normal anatomical and physiological changes that occur during pregnancy. Objective: Therefore, understanding these changes and their effect on almost every system, will help us appreciate the upcoming causes of AAP, mainly the non-obstetric surgical emergencies (e.g., appendicitis, cholecystitis). Methods: This article highlights the importance of the well-rounded care that should be offered to every pregnant patient presenting to any center with a Non-obstetric Acute Abdomen. The causes are discussed separately (for surgical pearls), laparoscopic approach and radiologic modality decision-making in pregnancy, which is an academic and a practice-based helpful summary. Results and Discussion: This article highlights the importance of the well-rounded care that should be offered to every pregnant patient presenting to any center with a Non-obstetric Acute Abdomen. The causes are discussed separately (for surgical pearls), laparoscopic approach and radiologic modality decision-making in pregnancy, which is an academic and a practice-based helpful summary. Results and Discussion: In addition, the sequence of ideas and language used in the article was based to help the reader understand the topic, rather than inform them about it. In addition, the utility of laparoscopy in pregnancy remains a concern due to the possible risk of injury to the fetus and fetal acidosis. Although, trials showed that laparoscopy was associated with less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. Moreover, in some cases radiographic imaging is necessary, posing a diagnostic dilemma. Conclusion: AAP is a major concern that requires early interventions to pinpoint the cause and manage the patient, properly.

[Diagnosis and management of primary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy: A systematic review and a longitudinal case study]. / Diagnostic et prise en charge d'hyperparathyroïdie primaire pendant la grossesse : revue de la littérature autour d'un cas.

OBJECTIVE: There is no specific recommendation for management in pregnant women: the aim of this review, based on a clinical case study, is to clarify its development, complications, risk factor and treatment. METHODS: A review of the literature was performed by consulting the Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct databases. RESULTS: Primary hyperparathyroidism is defined as excessive production of parathyroid hormone resulting in hypercalcemia. The prevalence of primary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy is not known. Indeed, the symptomatology, related to hypercalcemia, is not very specific and easily confused with the clinical manifestations of pregnancy. The physiological changes specific to the pregnant state frequently lead to a slight hypocalcemia which may complicate the diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism. Primary hyperparathyroidism results from a parathyroid adenoma in the majority of cases and is detected by ultrasound during pregnancy. Primary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy causes significant risks to both mother and fetus. The maternal complication rate is 14-67%, however, the most serious complication is hypercalcemic crisis, which requires increased surveillance in the postpartum period. Obstetrical complications are also induced by primary hyperparathyroidism, such as acute polyhydramnios, or intrauterine growth retardation. The fetal complication rate can reach 45-80% of cases with neonatal hypocalcemia as the main complication. If medical treatment is based on hyperhydration, only surgical treatment is curative. CONCLUSION: Surgery should be proposed to symptomatic patients or those with high blood calcium levels, discussed in interdisciplinary committee and should be organized ideally in the second trimester to avoid maternal and fetal complications.

General Surgery During Pregnancy and Gynecologic Emergencies.

Nonobstetrical surgical emergencies can occur throughout pregnancy but are often difficult to diagnose due to the physiologic and anatomical changes that occur during pregnancy. Medical providers should have insight into these changes and be familiar with options for the diagnosis and management of common nonobstetrical surgical emergencies, such as appendicitis, cholecystitis, and small bowel obstruction. Surgeons should also be aware of obstetrical emergencies, such as ectopic pregnancy and severe vaginal bleeding, which may be life threatening to mother and the fetus. Intraoperatively, surgeons should be familiar with minimally invasive approaches for surgical diseases and special anesthetic considerations for pregnant patients.

Hysteroscopic morcellation vs. curettage for removal of retained products of conception: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study the comparison between hysteroscopic morcellation (HM) of retained products of conception (RPOC) with ultrasound (US)-guided electric vacuum aspiration in terms of intrauterine adhesion (IUA) formation, efficacy, and complications. DESIGN: A randomized controlled, nonblinded trial. SETTING: Three teaching hospitals and one university hospital from April 2015 to June 2022. PATIENTS: A total of 133 women with RPOC on US, ranging from 1-4 cm, were randomized to receive either HM or electric vacuum aspiration. INTERVENTION: Hysteroscopic morcellation was performed with the TruClear System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Electric vacuum aspiration was performed using an 8- or 10-mm flexible plastic Karman cannula under US guidance. Women allocated to vacuum aspiration underwent the procedure as soon as possible. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In the HM group, an office diagnostic hysteroscopy was planned a minimum of 6 weeks after the end of pregnancy, followed by retained product of conception removal at least 8 weeks after the end of the pregnancy. Postoperatively, an office second-look hysteroscopy was scheduled to assess the primary outcome of IUAs. RESULTS: Postoperative IUAs were seen in 14.3% (9/63) of patients in the HM group and 20.6% (13/64) of patients in the vacuum aspiration group (-6% [-19.1% to 7.1%]). Significantly more RPOC were removed completely by HM compared with vacuum aspiration (95.2% vs. 82.5% (-14% [-24.9% to -3.1%]), and additional operative hysteroscopy was less frequently necessary in the HM group (12.5%) compared with the vacuum aspiration group (31.3%) (-20.1% [-34.3% to -6%]). The median operating time was shorter for vacuum aspiration compared with HM (5.80 minutes vs. 7.15 minutes). No differences were observed between HM and vacuum aspiration for the occurrence of intraoperative or postoperative complications (5.5% vs. 5.0% and 2.7% vs. 1.3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In our randomized controlled trial, no significant differences were found in the occurrence of IUAs and complications. However, the RPOC were more often completely removed by HM than vacuum aspiration, and the HM group required fewer additional hysteroscopic treatments. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR4923 (https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR4923). Date of registration: November 23, 2014, date of initial participant enrollment: January 1, 2015.

Periumbilical giant abscess and intestinal leakage in late pregnancy: A rare case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Complicated Periumbilical abscess in late pregnancy is rare in clinical practice. Pubmed searches for articles published from January 1980 to September 2021. Such related reports did not retrieve article about "pregnancy" and "periumbilical abscess." CASE PRESENTATION: We reported on a 34-year-old female patient who was admitted to the hospital with periumbilical pain for 3 days at 34 + 1 weeks of pregnancy. The result of imaging examination showed that there was an inflammatory mass in the middle and lower abdominal wall in the third trimester of pregnancy. The periumbilical abscess was punctured and drained first, and then the pregnant woman was assisted to give birth to a baby girl through vagina after the condition was stable.Subsequently, laparotomy + abdominal abscess resection and drainage + partial small bowel resection + ileostomy were performed. Pathology showed inflammatory mass. CONCLUSIONS: Periumbilical abscess in the third trimester of pregnancy is rare clinically. For some pregnant women with previous trauma and surgical history, obstetric examination should not be restricted. For example, pregnant women with a history of abdominal surgery should expand the range of abdominal color Doppler ultrasound during the prenatal examination. When necessary, combine with computed tomography for diagnosis and treatment, avoid missed diagnosis, which will make the treatment more difficult and increase the risk. If the pregnant women has corresponding symptoms in the third trimester, vaginal delivery can be performed to terminate the pregnancy, and then the periumbilical abscess can be removed. At the same time, closely monitor the vital signs of newborn and mothers.

Office intrauterine morcellation for retained products of conception.

OBJECTIVE: Proposing hysteroscopic morcellation (HM) as a surgical-therapeutic approach in the treatment of retained products of conception (RPOC) to prevent intrauterine adhesions (IUAs). DESIGN: Prospective analysis. SETTING: A teaching and university hospital. PATIENTS: Women with RPOC. INTERVENTIONS: Office -HM with 'Truclear 5 C'. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive patients presenting with trophoblastic residue retention after miscarriage and interruption of pregnancy or placenta remnants after cesarean section or delivery were enrolled. These women underwent office-HM with 'Truclear 5 C'. Primary outcomes were median time and rate of hospitalization. The quality of the specimen was also analyzed. A hysteroscopic second look for IUAs was performed. RESULTS: Mean procedure time was six minutes (SD ± 5). Tissue samples had a mean collection size 2.5 cm3+0.9. 38% of the samples had spotting or abnormal vaginal discharge. Dilatation of the cervical canal was not performed in any case. Second-look hysteroscopy did not show any de novo IUAs in any of the enrolled patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the hysteroscopic treatment of RPOC, HM is a valid choice in an office setting without the use of cervical dilatation. Removal of RPOC was uneventful in all cases, simple and carried out faster without any adverse outcomes.

A case of moyamoya disease diagnosed as cerebral infarction in the early postpregnancy period and surgically treated by bilateral revascularization after term delivery.

We treated a 37-year-old Japanese woman with moyamoya disease who developed cerebral infarction in the early period after pregnancy and had undergone infertility treatment. After being adequately informed, including regarding the risk of stroke in the perinatal period and the option to prioritize the treatment of moyamoya disease even if the pregnancy was interrupted, the patient decided to continue the pregnancy and underwent surgical treatment after a full-term delivery by caesarean section. No new stroke was observed throughout the perinatal period or postoperative course. Since serious stroke during the perinatal period has also been reported in moyamoya disease, it is important to plan "tailored" treatment by sufficiently informing patients considering individual backgrounds and for multiple medical departments, including obstetrics, neurology, and neurosurgery departments, to carry out close outpatient follow-up in the perinatal period and carefully careful medication usage and radiological examinations.

Maternal Malnutrition During Pregnancy Among Women with Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: As the utilization of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) continues to rise, it is important to address the nutritional needs of women who had MBS who become pregnant. Not meeting those nutritional needs could lead to complications associated with malnutrition. To better understand the relationship between MBS, pregnancy, and malnutrition, this study sought to determine whether differences exist in the presence of malnutrition during pregnancy in women with a history of MBS compared to women without a history of MBS. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2012 to 2017, which samples 20% of hospital discharges in the USA. Multivariate logistic regression models were fitted, and odds rations and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with obesity and MBS as the independent variables and malnutrition during pregnancy as the dependent variable. Covariates included in the multivariate model were age, primary payer, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and depression. RESULTS: Compared to women who did not have MBS, women who had MBS had higher odds of malnutrition during pregnancy (aOR = 8.33, 95% CI 7.30-9.50), this result was moderated by racial category (aORBlack = 6.35, 95% CI 4.97-8.13; aORwhite = 8.25, 95% CI 7.00-9.73; aORLatina = 10.93, 95% CI 8.38-14.25). Women with obesity also had higher odds of malnutrition during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The increased odds of malnutrition among women with MBS suggests that it is important to consider tailoring nutrition recommendations to address the different nutritional needs of pregnant women who had MBS and may be at risk for malnutrition.

Post-cesarean section laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the time of cesarean section is novel in medicine. It is safe, feasible, and cost-effective. CASE PRESENTATION: A 29-year-old G3P2 + 0 woman had two previous cesarean sections. She was pregnant at 32 weeks. The fetus had anencephaly. She had acute cholecystitis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy done at the time of termination of pregnancy by cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: In a critical period, such as acute cholecystitis, the combination of laparoscopic cholecystectomy immediately post cesarean section is effective if the surgeon is highly qualified and experienced.

Torsion of uterus in twin pregnancy.

Uterine torsion is defined as a rotation of uterus around its axis by more than 45° in its longitudinal length. Uterine torsion is very rare, it is reported that a physician encounters it only 1 time in a lifetime. Our case describes uterine torsion in a twin pregnancy, in a completely asymptomatic patient, where the dia-gnosis was made only peroperatively.

Rotation of the uterus to obtain a lower transverse incision in the posterior wall in a cesarean section: a case report and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that cesarean section with a transverse incision at the lower posterior wall of the uterus is suitable for some special obstetric cases. CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old primigravida with a previous surgical history of laparoscopic myomectomy underwent elective cesarean section at 39 weeks and 2 days of gestation. During surgery, there were severe pelvic adhesions and engorged vessels on the anterior wall. Considering safety, we rotated the uterus 180 degrees and made a lower transverse incision on the posterior wall. The infant was healthy and the patient had no complications. CONCLUSIONS: A low transverse incision in the posterior uterine wall is safe and effective when the incision of the anterior wall encounters a dilemma, especially in patients with severe pelvic adhesions. We recommended this approach should be done in selected cases.

Nonobstetric Surgical Emergencies in Pregnancy.

In this article, we discuss the major nonobstetric surgical complications that may occur in pregnancy. We highlight specific diagnostic challenges particularly with imaging modalities and radiation considerations for the fetus. Topics covered in this article include appendicitis, intestinal obstruction, gallstone disease, hepatic rupture, perforated peptic ulcer, mesenteric venous thrombosis, splenic artery aneurysm rupture, and aortic dissection.

Appendectomy during pregnancy: rates, safety, and outcomes over a five-year period. A hospital-based follow-up study.

INTRODUCTION: Appendicitis is the most common acute abdominal complication during pregnancy. If appendix perforation occurs there is an increasing risk of preterm delivery and other pregnancy complications. OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of pregnancy after appendectomy, the mode of surgery used, appendectomy rates, and complications. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of pregnant women with, or without, appendectomy at South Stockholm General Hospital, December 2015 to February 2021 in a setting where pregnant women are prioritized for surgery and laparoscopic surgery was standard of care in first half of pregnancy. Data on preoperative imaging, surgical method, intraoperative findings, microscopic findings, hospital stay, pregnancy, and 30-day complications were prospectively recorded in a local appendectomy register. A non-pregnant control group was gathered comprising women of fertile age in the same study interval. RESULTS: During the study period 50 pregnant women, of whom 44 gave birth, underwent appendectomy of 38 199 women giving birth. There were no differences between women with or without appendectomy in proportion of preterm delivery (4.5% vs. 5.6%), small-for-gestational age (2.3% vs. 6.2%), or Cesarean delivery (18.2% vs. 20.4%). The rate of appendix perforation was 19% in non-pregnant control group compared to 12% among pregnancy. There was no case of perforated appendix in the second half of pregnancy. However, women with gestational age > 20 weeks more frequently had an unaffected appendix compared to those operated ≤ 20 gestational weeks (4/11 vs. 2/39, p = .005). Laparoscopic surgery was used in 97% of non-pregnant control group, 92% of appendectomies ≤ 20 weeks gestation, and in 27% >20 weeks. As compared to first half, the appendectomy rate was three times lower during the second half of pregnancy. Pregnant women had priority for surgery < 6 h compared to < 24 h among non-pregnant women, this resulted in a shorter time-to-surgery among pregnant women (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Routine laparoscopic surgery and time priority for pregnant surgery is associated with a low risk of perforation, preterm birth and other complications. However, a low threshold for surgery may increase the risk of a negative exploration.